I think the major difference is that Pence finally recognized a "limit" to Trumps actions after essentially cheer leading for him for all four years. He was at least quite quiet with regard to anything that might have bothered him.
For Vance the illegality and unconstitutionality, like the cruelty, IS the point. He will act as a coconspirator and not just a cheer leader.
Vance is more dangerous than Trump because people take him more seriously. And he’s slightly more self-aware. But he’s just as undignified in his whorish selling of his alternative history as well as his greed and self-dealing. He’s just a younger version of Trump.
That's the only way to account for such immediate and reflexive whataboutery. You didn't read it. If you had, you would've noticed that the article has nothing to do with life "under Biden-Harris."
I’m glad Trump picked someone that can carry on his legacy if you guys get lucky with your upcoming third assassination attempt.
Vance is updated trump. Full stop.
I think the major difference is that Pence finally recognized a "limit" to Trumps actions after essentially cheer leading for him for all four years. He was at least quite quiet with regard to anything that might have bothered him.
For Vance the illegality and unconstitutionality, like the cruelty, IS the point. He will act as a coconspirator and not just a cheer leader.
Vance is more dangerous than Trump because people take him more seriously. And he’s slightly more self-aware. But he’s just as undignified in his whorish selling of his alternative history as well as his greed and self-dealing. He’s just a younger version of Trump.
Bernie, with all due respect, under Biden-Harris we have gone from:
* No war to world war
* High rent and insane grocery prices
* Sudden, massive importation of illegal aliens jumping the line in front of qualified legal applicants
* FEMA ignoring a catastrophe because they illegally spent their money on illegal aliens
Did I miss anything?
eat shit, 'doug ross'
Dougie. You’re cute when you try to think.
You missed the entire article, yes.
That's the only way to account for such immediate and reflexive whataboutery. You didn't read it. If you had, you would've noticed that the article has nothing to do with life "under Biden-Harris."
I always know what's coming after "With all due respect..."
And yet isn't that the meta-theme of your article?
Influencing people to vote for endless war and one-party rule?
I need some context, but thank you for the response.
There are only two people advancing the notion of one party minority rule and unitary executive governance. Trump and Vance.