Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Holly Hart's avatar

Thank you for elucidating this complex subject. I would add that in any group of people, there will be those who use whatever power they have to protect other people (mostly men) who engage in child sexual abuse because, tragically, there are so many who do engage in child sexual abuse. This is why it is so difficult to curb it. At every level of criminal justice systems and in every level of government, there are predators who work to protect each other, and they are usually successful in doing so. And they can count on the naivete of too many people to go along with what they do and rationalize it by invoking freedom of speech, freedom of association and other civil rights.

Expand full comment
fogcorn's avatar

A few things to consider: 1) Telegram isn’t a social media platform; it’s a messaging platform. ICQ, AIM, and other platforms that were never considered social media shouldn’t be either. The social graph isn’t a crucial aspect of the platform. 2) The design of Telegram is indeed flawed because it doesn’t offer end-to-end encryption, as mentioned in the substack. However, does that automatically make it not a platform for free speech? If it were end-to-end encrypted, what would that change?

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts