18 Comments

This is a great piece. Thank you for your courage in naming what seems obviously to have been the case. This was a COUP ATTEMPT. I've been surprised at how there's been relatively little discussion about this term. Your argument is very sound and convincing, although I didn't need to be convinced. Yet I appreciate your nuanced argument. Hopefully it will convince others who might not be pre-disposed to think this way.

Expand full comment

There's a reason so many people thought the J6 Committee testimony indicating that DJT wanted the Secret Service to take him to the Capitol Building was so significant. Had he gone there and actively urged on his supporters - or even passively observed them from a safe distance - that image would have ended all debate about his intentions.

Expand full comment

He actually DID passively observe them from a safe distance (on his tv in the Oval Office dining room). He made no attempt to call them off for almost three hours

Expand full comment

Clearly a coup attempt. It was a forcible attempt to throw an election that didn't belong in the House, into the House, where the presumption was that the actual Constitutionally legal result would be reversed.

A coup attempt. Period. Full stop.

Expand full comment

Adding one other comment here. GOP leaders twist themselves into knots to avoid called January 6th an attempted coup because scores of their members were active participants, and if our political system wasn't so tribal, those members who supported the coup attempt would be expelled from Congress and prosecuted.

Expand full comment

the entire effort to overturn the election was an attempted coup.

So we might argue that this "coup" is ongoing and still a work in progress? A coup may fail but the conditions that made the attempted "coup" possible are still there. A coup can be seen as a sudden and dramatic attack on the legitimacy of the government in power. But the coup can also be a slow moving incremental erosion of the authority and legitimacy of the government.

Expand full comment

The only attempted coup was what the Dems did for all of Trump's term. They're still attempting to control the narrative. Dems are evil. All of them.

Expand full comment

Let's see who goes to prison.

Expand full comment

You voted for a potato. ROFL!

Expand full comment

Well gosh, then President Spud is a marvel, getting done what Rumpy could not.

Expand full comment

Proving your support of the U.S. becoming a Banana Republic. You're so very Useful. Bless your little shriveled heart.

Expand full comment

No, that's the Heritage Foundation's plan. Check out their Project 2025 playbook. Trump loves Banana Republic dictators and wishes, bigly, to emulate them.

Expand full comment

According to this since I was in DC and thought about a coup I must have attempted one.

Expand full comment

No. Unless you massed a group of people to attack the House, illegally entered the House, and encouraged people to take action.

So, no. Just thinking about it is not a crime. It is a crime to attempt it - regardless of the success or quality of effort. Attempting a crime IS illegal.

Expand full comment

Actually, no.

Expand full comment

Based on your multiple definitions of what constitutes a coup, anti-trumpers like you ran a coup against the Trump administration for 4 years.

Expand full comment

There is just one definition of a coup: a sudden, violent, and unlawful seizure of power from a government. Donald J. Trump passively participated in a mob's sudden, violent, and unlawful attempt to seize power from our government. He lit the fuse and then sat and watched the coup attempt unfold from the safety of the Oval office dining room for about three hours

Expand full comment

This may be the only time I agree with a Cato Institute writer.

Expand full comment