“He has suggested that the Insurrection Act could authorize him to enlist the military to quell domestic violence.”
Thanks to all the dumb bastards who kept calling the January 6 riot an “insurrection”, every riot can now be counted as an insurrection by whoever is in charge.
"Look what you did, libs. You correctly called an insurrection an insurrection. And now, based on that, this illiberal demagogue is now calling non-insurrections insurrections. This is on you, libs."
Unless you plan to start by examining & expounding for your readers on how the current occupant of the White House is *actually* acting dictatorially and fascistly (both towards Trump their opponent, & all of us as Americans & our constitutional rights), then save your breath bc this is just one of a long line of TDS partisan screeds that can’t possibly cover the topic objectively, & it will show.
Lol - pls explain how ‘covering him objectively’ but not mentioning his weaponizing of the justice system against his opponents & trying to forcefully inject experimental chemicals on the entire population is ‘fascist bullshit’??
Joe Biden tried to force me to take shot. Trump did not. Who is real authoritarian? A president who forces people to get a vaccine that doesn’t stop transmission to keep a job is not good. You all aren’t the good guys.
Was that your first vaccination? What about all the other vaccines you need to participate in many aspects of society? Is it just because that vaccine wasn't 100% effective against transmission that in your mind it was clearly an authoritarian over reach? To what end goal? Just as an exercise of power?
My guess is that you have bought into a lot other covid conspiracies to come to this conclusion. Do you see it a the "plandemic"? I find it so perplexing how people end up in thinking this way
Look up the WHO’s criteria for a pandemic. Also, look up how much money was riding on the jabs. Research what constitutes an HCID. Research what constitutes an ILI. Ask yourself why so many politicians were dancing and laughing with each other. Why would they do that if they thought there was something to be scared of? Conspiracies are just the act of conspiratorial activity, so the term shouldn’t have to be interchangeable with ‘nonsense’. Walking in one direction in a supermarket in the apparent belief that viruses only float one way is nonsense – not the concept that the government of liars could be lying.
Do you understand that none of this is actual evidence of anything. It is jumble incoherent bits of information that have been picked apart and pieced together through paranoid assumptions inorder to weave this conspiratorial narrative. It all rests on well of course these people have something to hide because they're people in power doing things out my control. Let's try an work backwards from this assumption and see figure what it is they're doing.
It is incredibly gullible and niave way thinking about an issue. Also a potentially destructive way of thinking. If you want to believe in a conspiratorial world view it is easy to fine "evidence" to support these views. You just have to ignore anything inconvenient and not question sources that fit what you want to believe.
Nah it doesn’t rest all on that. It stems from common sense and personal experience. Look what happened according to Channel 4 among other parts of the MSM with swine flu (back when you could actually call a respiratory disease a kind of flu without being told off for minimising an infection): https://youtu.be/q9qeLcq3y8w?si=kN2DAcP0QDWJbErV
I don’t really want to believe anything, and I certainly don’t want to ignore anything either. What I want is for there to be less acceptance of restricting people’s freedom, especially over something that most people need a test for them to even consider themselves infected.
I completely agree that there’s a big difference between evidence and proof though, but that’s just another example of why you should listen to all sides of an argument rather than insulting the people who you think are against you. I’m not trying to go against you: I’m trying to point out that the burden of proof is on you to explain why COVID-19 was as bad as we were told in relation to the very mixed messages made by the very same people who weren’t taking it seriously themselves. If I were scared of an infection spreading through the air from people with no respiratory illness symptoms whatsoever, I’d have stayed at home without having to be told over and over and over again.
My advice is to just be more critical of what you’re told, because even – in fact, especially – Neil Ferguson wasn’t taking the infection seriously. He was having an affair.
Sorry for being insulting. I am not going to deep dive into this info to try to an debunk these claims. For one it is futile because people are so committed to believing this stuff that they just pivot to finding new bunk evidence to support their views. Also no one has that amount of time.
I do encourage you to really interrogate why you believe certain things and honestly ask yourself if you're demanding rigorous evidence, or just maniacally connecting dots that align with you desired world view. Also it is important to recognize how much these beliefs target and malign individuals. That shouldn't be taken lightly.
I know these things can fun to believe and look convincing from a glance, but it really is worth stepping outside of this world view. Seeing the world through this conspiratorial lens can have real world negative impacts, more so on individuals involved, but also trickles into society at large. Inevitably it does make you less open to information, not more, and ultimately less informed, not more. Highly encourage you take step back and really question you information streams.
Thanks, but I encourage you to try to debunk them. This is a polite debate.
It’s hard for me to question my information streams though, because I refer to health authorities. It was Public Health England that said COVID-19 wasn’t an HCID.
This isn’t meant to mean that ‘public health authorities’ is interchangeable with ‘correct’ of course, but my point is that there are enough serious publications questioning the dangers of COVID-19 that I believe it shouldn’t be written off as merely conspiratorial thinking.
Plus, of course, when something is a conspiracy theory, it doesn’t make it wrong anyway. But consider focusing on the controversies of companies like Pfizer and people like Bill Gates. I’m not saying any negative press they receive has to be correct (I’ve been quite trusting of them personally), but more that there’s nothing wrong with questioning the questionable.
Nope and since I have been proven correct so far, it wasn’t a theory. The mRNA shot have been in development by modern since 2013 with DARPA. It has never been successful and all of a sudden it worked for Covid? I was born at night, but I wasn’t born last night. You have been manipulated and tricked. It’s okay to be angry and scared. Ask yourself, why are cancer rates exploding in highly vaccinated countries.
At the end of the day, people were injected with untested, unsafe vaccines that were contaminated by bacterial dna. Let’s see in 5 years who is right. Spoilers: you can not go against nature.
Again, it is sad but you folks with mRNA shot, you may not even be fully human after the contaminated vaccine that Pfizer and Moderna send out. Doesn’t bother you to know, they couldn’t even be bothered to manufacture the shot correctly?
I’ve read this behavior from history. About 60% of people will do whatever authority tells them. The milgram experiments shows how compliant people really are. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
Is immunity for official acts limited to the president?
President Trump did not need this. He used executive privilege to shield himself. His official staff would not go along with his illegal acts. He executed his illegal acts through his shadow government (team crazy) vs his official staff (team normal). He used pardon power to protect team crazy. This decision seems to be designed to get him off the hook in situations where he made mistakes (Georgia call was recorded, stealing and hiding government documents, not taking action on Jan 6).
I wish you the best of luck in this venture! Practical recommendations are difficult in this world. Even Lawfare's excellent book "After Trump," with model legislation, ended up little more than a whisper in the wind after the 117th took the stage.
“He has suggested that the Insurrection Act could authorize him to enlist the military to quell domestic violence.”
Thanks to all the dumb bastards who kept calling the January 6 riot an “insurrection”, every riot can now be counted as an insurrection by whoever is in charge.
"Look what you did, libs. You correctly called an insurrection an insurrection. And now, based on that, this illiberal demagogue is now calling non-insurrections insurrections. This is on you, libs."
Unless you plan to start by examining & expounding for your readers on how the current occupant of the White House is *actually* acting dictatorially and fascistly (both towards Trump their opponent, & all of us as Americans & our constitutional rights), then save your breath bc this is just one of a long line of TDS partisan screeds that can’t possibly cover the topic objectively, & it will show.
Lol - pls explain how ‘covering him objectively’ but not mentioning his weaponizing of the justice system against his opponents & trying to forcefully inject experimental chemicals on the entire population is ‘fascist bullshit’??
The truth hurts. Clearly you’re not coping well with it, nor capable of making a rational argument.
Joe Biden tried to force me to take shot. Trump did not. Who is real authoritarian? A president who forces people to get a vaccine that doesn’t stop transmission to keep a job is not good. You all aren’t the good guys.
Was that your first vaccination? What about all the other vaccines you need to participate in many aspects of society? Is it just because that vaccine wasn't 100% effective against transmission that in your mind it was clearly an authoritarian over reach? To what end goal? Just as an exercise of power?
My guess is that you have bought into a lot other covid conspiracies to come to this conclusion. Do you see it a the "plandemic"? I find it so perplexing how people end up in thinking this way
Also, Bill Gates himself compared COVID to the flu.
Look up the WHO’s criteria for a pandemic. Also, look up how much money was riding on the jabs. Research what constitutes an HCID. Research what constitutes an ILI. Ask yourself why so many politicians were dancing and laughing with each other. Why would they do that if they thought there was something to be scared of? Conspiracies are just the act of conspiratorial activity, so the term shouldn’t have to be interchangeable with ‘nonsense’. Walking in one direction in a supermarket in the apparent belief that viruses only float one way is nonsense – not the concept that the government of liars could be lying.
Do you understand that none of this is actual evidence of anything. It is jumble incoherent bits of information that have been picked apart and pieced together through paranoid assumptions inorder to weave this conspiratorial narrative. It all rests on well of course these people have something to hide because they're people in power doing things out my control. Let's try an work backwards from this assumption and see figure what it is they're doing.
It is incredibly gullible and niave way thinking about an issue. Also a potentially destructive way of thinking. If you want to believe in a conspiratorial world view it is easy to fine "evidence" to support these views. You just have to ignore anything inconvenient and not question sources that fit what you want to believe.
Nah it doesn’t rest all on that. It stems from common sense and personal experience. Look what happened according to Channel 4 among other parts of the MSM with swine flu (back when you could actually call a respiratory disease a kind of flu without being told off for minimising an infection): https://youtu.be/q9qeLcq3y8w?si=kN2DAcP0QDWJbErV
I don’t really want to believe anything, and I certainly don’t want to ignore anything either. What I want is for there to be less acceptance of restricting people’s freedom, especially over something that most people need a test for them to even consider themselves infected.
I completely agree that there’s a big difference between evidence and proof though, but that’s just another example of why you should listen to all sides of an argument rather than insulting the people who you think are against you. I’m not trying to go against you: I’m trying to point out that the burden of proof is on you to explain why COVID-19 was as bad as we were told in relation to the very mixed messages made by the very same people who weren’t taking it seriously themselves. If I were scared of an infection spreading through the air from people with no respiratory illness symptoms whatsoever, I’d have stayed at home without having to be told over and over and over again.
My advice is to just be more critical of what you’re told, because even – in fact, especially – Neil Ferguson wasn’t taking the infection seriously. He was having an affair.
Sorry for being insulting. I am not going to deep dive into this info to try to an debunk these claims. For one it is futile because people are so committed to believing this stuff that they just pivot to finding new bunk evidence to support their views. Also no one has that amount of time.
I do encourage you to really interrogate why you believe certain things and honestly ask yourself if you're demanding rigorous evidence, or just maniacally connecting dots that align with you desired world view. Also it is important to recognize how much these beliefs target and malign individuals. That shouldn't be taken lightly.
I know these things can fun to believe and look convincing from a glance, but it really is worth stepping outside of this world view. Seeing the world through this conspiratorial lens can have real world negative impacts, more so on individuals involved, but also trickles into society at large. Inevitably it does make you less open to information, not more, and ultimately less informed, not more. Highly encourage you take step back and really question you information streams.
Thanks, but I encourage you to try to debunk them. This is a polite debate.
It’s hard for me to question my information streams though, because I refer to health authorities. It was Public Health England that said COVID-19 wasn’t an HCID.
This isn’t meant to mean that ‘public health authorities’ is interchangeable with ‘correct’ of course, but my point is that there are enough serious publications questioning the dangers of COVID-19 that I believe it shouldn’t be written off as merely conspiratorial thinking.
Plus, of course, when something is a conspiracy theory, it doesn’t make it wrong anyway. But consider focusing on the controversies of companies like Pfizer and people like Bill Gates. I’m not saying any negative press they receive has to be correct (I’ve been quite trusting of them personally), but more that there’s nothing wrong with questioning the questionable.
Nope and since I have been proven correct so far, it wasn’t a theory. The mRNA shot have been in development by modern since 2013 with DARPA. It has never been successful and all of a sudden it worked for Covid? I was born at night, but I wasn’t born last night. You have been manipulated and tricked. It’s okay to be angry and scared. Ask yourself, why are cancer rates exploding in highly vaccinated countries.
At the end of the day, people were injected with untested, unsafe vaccines that were contaminated by bacterial dna. Let’s see in 5 years who is right. Spoilers: you can not go against nature.
Here is the proof it was government funded DOD project
https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2013/DARPA-Awards-Moderna-Therapeutics-a-Grant-for-up-to-25-Million-to-Develop-Messenger-RNA-Therapeutics/default.aspx
Again, it is sad but you folks with mRNA shot, you may not even be fully human after the contaminated vaccine that Pfizer and Moderna send out. Doesn’t bother you to know, they couldn’t even be bothered to manufacture the shot correctly?
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/PandemicPreparedness/Phillip-Buckhaults-SC-Senate-09122023-final.pdf
Make peace with your god.
See this makes a lot more sense now. I figured you must be a conspiratorial nut job. Best of luck to you in finding your way out of that rabbit hole.
I have no position on this, my family and I are pure strain humans. I don’t know what the law is on genetically modified organisms.
And they keep running around desperately trying to convince everyone (most especially themselves) that they somehow are ‘the good guys’. 🤦🏻♂️😂
I’ve read this behavior from history. About 60% of people will do whatever authority tells them. The milgram experiments shows how compliant people really are. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
Is immunity for official acts limited to the president?
President Trump did not need this. He used executive privilege to shield himself. His official staff would not go along with his illegal acts. He executed his illegal acts through his shadow government (team crazy) vs his official staff (team normal). He used pardon power to protect team crazy. This decision seems to be designed to get him off the hook in situations where he made mistakes (Georgia call was recorded, stealing and hiding government documents, not taking action on Jan 6).
I wish you the best of luck in this venture! Practical recommendations are difficult in this world. Even Lawfare's excellent book "After Trump," with model legislation, ended up little more than a whisper in the wind after the 117th took the stage.