If you bothered to take the Piker quotes in context, you would come up with entirely different meanings; his statement about the USSR was not about their politics or authoritarianism, but the fact their demise allowed capitalist hegemony to take over the world, with disastrous consequences.. Piker is basically a Democratic Socialist, like Bernie. Piker's remark about 9/11 only meant that US foreign policy in the Middle East, such as arming one terrorist group to attack another terrorist group, made the US vulnerable, much like previous decades when the US meddled in Latin America; granted, the verb "deserved" was a poor choice ("allowed" would have been better), but Piker streams almost continually, and "misspeaking" is bound to happen. And OF COURSE he critiques liberalism! However, he is more than willing to defend his views, unlike Owens. Piker doesn't DEFEND Hamas for the violence; he simply understands what Gaza has been through, especially now. He is making an argument, Owens is just creating conspiracies.
Omg this is such absolute bullshit! Your first paragraph was full of inaccurate statements and you base the rest of the article on that. Unsubscribed - F off.
I would love to live in the world where I do not know the names Candace Owens and Hasan Piker. I am very troubled if the Dems think Piker can be exploited to help secure the lefty votes.
What a lousy exercise of sophistication ! What a sad hill to go die on !
Your attempt to present Mr Piker as an equivalent of Mr Fuentes, Miss Owens and Mr Carlson is as wobbly as it is disengenuous.
It also seems you don’t understand some basic science principles such as causality or relativity. America (not American) deserved 9/11 because of its government’s inflamming foreign policies. And no, the alleged rape of civilians on october 7 cannot justify the murder of 70 000 + civilians.
THIS is were your poor chatgptesque reasonning and the actions of Israeli government are leading us nowadays : to stupid numbers comparisons. A battle you couldn’t win if you were to be simply honest, empathetic and most of all intelligent.
Because this is the fatal flaw of democrats and liberals. They make calculations. They’re not politicians, they are numbers’ slaves. Instead of listening to people and engineering new policies resulting in the improvement of their well being, they let numbers do the thinking instead. And numbers have this thing for them is that not only they make cowards but in complexe systems, numbers don’t guarantee anything.
Piker or whoever left flank influencer you can find aren’t THE problem. The problem is that democrats and liberals in general are incompetents and it’s starting to show.
Are we going to pretend that Tucker is more offensive than Douglas Murray? The only difference is the identity group being criticized. Is Candace different than Matt Walsh? Matt is still platformed by Ben.
Is there anyone more inflammatory than Trump? From his attacks on migrants to rob reiner?
That some libs won't criticize him relates to my thesis that liberals tend to think everyone is a liberal deep down, and so it's fine to embrace anyone who seems to be on their side, no matter how illiberal, because it's all an act.
Hasan Piker, noted dog shocker and fan of Diddy parties, and the rest of Blue MAGA has no place in the liberal Democratic Party. That was cemented long ago and reaffirmed by his recent defense of Maureen Galindo, the Democratic primary candidate who wants to put “Zionists” into camps. He said Democrats should ignore her and tried shifting the blame for wanting to recreate the Holocaust off her onto Israel.
If you bothered to take the Piker quotes in context, you would come up with entirely different meanings; his statement about the USSR was not about their politics or authoritarianism, but the fact their demise allowed capitalist hegemony to take over the world, with disastrous consequences.. Piker is basically a Democratic Socialist, like Bernie. Piker's remark about 9/11 only meant that US foreign policy in the Middle East, such as arming one terrorist group to attack another terrorist group, made the US vulnerable, much like previous decades when the US meddled in Latin America; granted, the verb "deserved" was a poor choice ("allowed" would have been better), but Piker streams almost continually, and "misspeaking" is bound to happen. And OF COURSE he critiques liberalism! However, he is more than willing to defend his views, unlike Owens. Piker doesn't DEFEND Hamas for the violence; he simply understands what Gaza has been through, especially now. He is making an argument, Owens is just creating conspiracies.
thank you for helping me remove a newsletter from my reading list 💚
The difference here is that Piker has already sailed over that line several times. He’s basically a left wing Trump.
There is no such thing as a "left-wing" Trump.
A society that loses a shared reality eventually begins rewarding the people who can generate the strongest emotions, not the deepest understanding.
Omg this is such absolute bullshit! Your first paragraph was full of inaccurate statements and you base the rest of the article on that. Unsubscribed - F off.
lol mossad mouthpiece, fuck you
Was this written by a fascist MAGAt or a Blue MAGA leftist? Impossible to say
I would love to live in the world where I do not know the names Candace Owens and Hasan Piker. I am very troubled if the Dems think Piker can be exploited to help secure the lefty votes.
Would you like him if his name was Braydon Piker?
No, he’d be the same anti-Liberal propagandist
What a lousy exercise of sophistication ! What a sad hill to go die on !
Your attempt to present Mr Piker as an equivalent of Mr Fuentes, Miss Owens and Mr Carlson is as wobbly as it is disengenuous.
It also seems you don’t understand some basic science principles such as causality or relativity. America (not American) deserved 9/11 because of its government’s inflamming foreign policies. And no, the alleged rape of civilians on october 7 cannot justify the murder of 70 000 + civilians.
THIS is were your poor chatgptesque reasonning and the actions of Israeli government are leading us nowadays : to stupid numbers comparisons. A battle you couldn’t win if you were to be simply honest, empathetic and most of all intelligent.
Because this is the fatal flaw of democrats and liberals. They make calculations. They’re not politicians, they are numbers’ slaves. Instead of listening to people and engineering new policies resulting in the improvement of their well being, they let numbers do the thinking instead. And numbers have this thing for them is that not only they make cowards but in complexe systems, numbers don’t guarantee anything.
Piker or whoever left flank influencer you can find aren’t THE problem. The problem is that democrats and liberals in general are incompetents and it’s starting to show.
I am not a podcaster or polemicist and I wouldn’t say some of the things Piker has for sure.
But liberalism is a diabolical lie and failed experiment that led us to no health care, endless war and Donald Trump.
I held my nose and voted Harris and would do so again if the alternative is Trump. But I don’t believe in Obama/Biden/Clinton horse doo doo.
Are we going to pretend that Tucker is more offensive than Douglas Murray? The only difference is the identity group being criticized. Is Candace different than Matt Walsh? Matt is still platformed by Ben.
Is there anyone more inflammatory than Trump? From his attacks on migrants to rob reiner?
but Hasan Piker?
Don’t follow leaders. Watch the parking meters.
That some libs won't criticize him relates to my thesis that liberals tend to think everyone is a liberal deep down, and so it's fine to embrace anyone who seems to be on their side, no matter how illiberal, because it's all an act.
The article seems to have gotten some illiberals to unsubscribe. A good if unintended effect.
Hasan Piker, noted dog shocker and fan of Diddy parties, and the rest of Blue MAGA has no place in the liberal Democratic Party. That was cemented long ago and reaffirmed by his recent defense of Maureen Galindo, the Democratic primary candidate who wants to put “Zionists” into camps. He said Democrats should ignore her and tried shifting the blame for wanting to recreate the Holocaust off her onto Israel.
So you wrote a Candace Owens hit piece and called it Hasan Piker hit piece. So this is why I delete your emails
The irony is that liberals crave firey podcasters who can generate clicks or attract attention.
Careful what you wish for
Liberals want fiery LIBERAL podcasters. Hasan is an avowed anti-Liberal, in that he doesn’t believe in democracy