6 Comments
User's avatar
Moe Bowstern's avatar

Thank you for championing the truth of the witches ! See you behind the curtain some time soon let’s roam the galaxies for answers xoxo

Sanford Sklansky's avatar

Interesting what one can see in a movie. I have not and seen either one. I read a review of Wicked for Good in the Chicago Tribune. She gave it two stars. Perhaps she was not looking for a deeper meaning. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/20/review-wicked-for-good/

Eric K. Ward's avatar

You are right. It is quite “interesting” what one can see. It also takes a special type of person to not see something so evident. That’s actually much more fascinating. Thanks for your comments

Sanford Sklansky's avatar

Most people go to movies for entertainment. As I said I did not see either move. I didnt know there was a book until I read the review. The book came out in 1995. I wonder what you saw in the movie you would see in the book. You probably know that the wicked witch did not have a name in the Baum book or the 1939 movie. Alphabetical is derived from Baum's initials. L F B i assume you knew that as well. Funny the things you find out

Eric K. Ward's avatar

There’s no contradiction between meaning and entertainment. Most people don’t feel the need to draw a distinction. It’s really quite interesting that you do. Absolutely fascinating in fact. Yes. The Wizard of Oz is the first film I ever saw in color. I was a fan of the books as a kid and am quite familiar with both storylines. Thanks for inquiring.