Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sriram Khé's avatar

The secularization "thesis basically held that modernization and wealth diminished the hold of pre-scientific, religious beliefs on a society. Not in India."

This was always one of *the* biggest errors in the thinking about India's political economy.

My background is absolutely identical to yours (I suspect we might be about the same age, and we perhaps came to the US about the same time too.) But, I was always worried that India's religion problems would haunt the country for a long time. A problem right from birth doesn't go away easily, does it?

The secular framework that was the aspiration for Nehru's Congress, the rationalist Communist and Tamil Dravidian parties, was truly merely an ideal. It was disconnected from the ground-level reality, in which people were passionate about religion. Passion in favor of theirs, and passion against others.

At this point, I am less keen on the causes, and far more interested in what some of the short-term predictions might be for India's "liberal democracy." How much will Hindu authoritarianism strengthen in the coming years? For how long will minorities lie low before they decide that enough is enough? Will this result in radicalization of youth? Or, will Reagan's comment about "one generation away" work in the other direction too--as in Hindu authoritarianism only a generation away from losing?

Expand full comment
hw's avatar

Massive inequality bred magical thinking and conspiracy theories which bred a shift from belief in the state and religion to belief in a cult leader. There is also the unintended consequence, in the US at least, of home-grown anarchy. We already see that the base is leading Trump and the GOP. When they tire of scapegoats, the base will turn on their de facto leaders as they exult in their collective power. Then what?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts