Your critique of the Justice Department's monopoly over immigration enforcement highlights how politicization erodes due process and stability for both newcomers and citizens. A congressional‑run immigration court, modeled after the robust could provide the legislative oversight you propose, see https://milwaukee-county-courts.org for an example of transparent docket management. By anchoring adjudication in a joint House‑Senate judiciary committee, the process would be insulated from executive swing and align with constitutional Article I authority. Such a reform would reconcile humanitarian concerns with the rule of law you rightly defend.
Your critique of the Justice Department's politicization rightly highlights how executive control erodes due process, and the call for a dedicated Immigration Congressional Court could restore balance. The experience of the https://greenvillecountycourts.org shows that when jurisdiction is clearly delineated, procedural integrity improves without partisan interference. Establishing a joint House‑Senate Judiciary Committee to oversee such a court would embed legislative oversight directly into enforcement, preventing humanitarian rhetoric from becoming a vehicle for policy abuse. This structural shift could finally align immigration enforcement with constitutional safeguards.
So basically Immigration Enforcement should be handled by Congressional Courts of which The House and Senate Judiciary Committees should create a Joint Committee which is The Judiciary Committee.
You can't make immigration a humanitarian cause. If you do that, the virtue signalling schlubs are going to use every humanitarian cause under their power to displace the lives of those who are legally citizens.
Governments SHOULD NOT be allowed to open borders until they can take care of their own citizens first. This is common sense 101.
While the millions let in by the last Administration clog system in classic Cloward Piven-style, what do we do about all those poor saps who played by the rules? They should get precedence, of course, but should the former just enjoy defacto amnesty in the meantime?
Article I? Would that include Article I, Section 9, which forbids the federal government to regulate immigration before 1808, after which a constitutional amendment would have been required to create any such power?
Your critique of the Justice Department's monopoly over immigration enforcement highlights how politicization erodes due process and stability for both newcomers and citizens. A congressional‑run immigration court, modeled after the robust could provide the legislative oversight you propose, see https://milwaukee-county-courts.org for an example of transparent docket management. By anchoring adjudication in a joint House‑Senate judiciary committee, the process would be insulated from executive swing and align with constitutional Article I authority. Such a reform would reconcile humanitarian concerns with the rule of law you rightly defend.
Your critique of the Justice Department's politicization rightly highlights how executive control erodes due process, and the call for a dedicated Immigration Congressional Court could restore balance. The experience of the https://greenvillecountycourts.org shows that when jurisdiction is clearly delineated, procedural integrity improves without partisan interference. Establishing a joint House‑Senate Judiciary Committee to oversee such a court would embed legislative oversight directly into enforcement, preventing humanitarian rhetoric from becoming a vehicle for policy abuse. This structural shift could finally align immigration enforcement with constitutional safeguards.
Good read 👏🏼. No one is illegal.
We need The Creation of The Immigration Congressional Court under The Immigration Committee.
So basically Immigration Enforcement should be handled by Congressional Courts of which The House and Senate Judiciary Committees should create a Joint Committee which is The Judiciary Committee.
You can't make immigration a humanitarian cause. If you do that, the virtue signalling schlubs are going to use every humanitarian cause under their power to displace the lives of those who are legally citizens.
Governments SHOULD NOT be allowed to open borders until they can take care of their own citizens first. This is common sense 101.
While the millions let in by the last Administration clog system in classic Cloward Piven-style, what do we do about all those poor saps who played by the rules? They should get precedence, of course, but should the former just enjoy defacto amnesty in the meantime?
Article I? Would that include Article I, Section 9, which forbids the federal government to regulate immigration before 1808, after which a constitutional amendment would have been required to create any such power?